Tabletop Exercise Lead, The Anthropic Institute

Anthropic · San Francisco, CA · Public Benefit · listed October 17, 2026

The shape of it

Seniority
Senior
Experience asked
10+ years
Where
Not stated
Requirements listed
7
Length
1,799 words

In the posting’s own words

The role. You will build and lead the Institute’s tabletop exercise program and the team that runs it. Based on trends visible in the exponential and in consultation with technical experts, you will set the research agenda: which questions the exercises should answer, which scenarios to run, with which audiences, and what each run is meant to test. You will own the methods that make results comparable across runs and turn them into findings people outside the room can use. You will hire and manage a team plus a bench of facilitators, and you will be the program’s public voice.

What it asks for · 7

  • Have designed and run tabletop exercises, wargames, or simulations for senior decision-makers and published on the subject
  • Have training in a discipline that uses simulation, experimental methods or structured analysis
  • Have 10+ years of experience in national security, government, technology policy, or strategy
  • Can keep the scenarios technically grounded with a strong grasp of AI capabilities and safety research
  • Have managed a team, including hiring, setting direction, giving feedback and developing people
  • Use Claude and other AI tools extensively in your own work
  • Care about AI safety and Anthropic's public benefit mission

Also a plus

  • Published research on wargaming methods, simulation or crisis decision-making
  • Run exercises that fed into real policy or crisis-response decisions
  • Run multi-iteration or experimental wargames and analyzed results across runs
  • Used AI agents or language models as players, adjudicators or analysts in simulations
  • Led a research program or team through a period of growth
  • Existing relationships across national security, government, policy and AI, and are trusted in those communities
  • Published widely read work on AI, emerging technology, strategy or crisis decision-making

What the job covers

  • Set the program’s research agenda: the questions exercises should answer, the scenarios to run, and the audience for each
  • Design exercises as empirical studies: define what each run tests, standardize scenarios and data capture so results are comparable, and use repeated play to map the range of outcomes
  • Build the program’s measurement: pre- and post-exercise assessments, decision logs, transcript analysis and after-action reports
  • Turn results into findings: publish on what the exercises show, and brief senior people inside and outside Anthropic on the gaps they expose
  • Hire, manage and develop a team and a bench of facilitators
  • Make the program scalable: maintain a library of tested scenarios that the team reuses most of the time, refreshed on a regular cadence so they stay timely
  • Build a facilitator kit ("TTX in a box") so other internal teams or external partners can run exercises to the same standard
  • Create and direct the tools behind the exercises, including Claude-driven simulations that generate a live outside-world feed during play

Tools and skills named

Security & compliance
  • Security4×

Words the posting leans on

  • exercises19×
  • run19×
  • people11×
  • research11×
  • program10×
  • scenarios10×
  • simulations10×
  • results7×
  • decisions6×
  • methods6×
  • policy6×
  • published6×
  • build5×
  • tools5×
  • analysis4×
  • crisis decision-making4×

Counted from the posting after the mission statement and the legal notices are set aside. The ones near the top are the ones a screener is looking for.

The posting, your resume, and the gaps between them. One click loads all three.

More open at Anthropic

every open role at Anthropic →

How this page was made

An automated read of a public job posting, fetched November 2, 2026 and last changed by Anthropic on October 17, 2026. Every list above is pulled from the posting’s own sentences — nothing rewritten, nothing added, no judgment about the role or the company. Counts and seniority are read off the text by rule, so they can be wrong where the posting is unusual. The original is the only thing that binds. Openings close without warning; check the source before spending an evening on it.