Research Engineer, Model Evaluations

Anthropic · Remote-Friendly (Travel-Required) | San Francisco, CA | New York City, NY · AI Research & Engineering · listed April 28, 2026

The shape of it

Seniority
Not stated
Where
Hybrid
Stated pay
$500,000 – $850,000 USD
Requirements listed
5
Length
1,195 words

In the posting’s own words

We're looking for Research Engineers to build the evaluations that tell us — and the world — what Claude can actually do. Your work will turn ambiguous notions of "intelligence" into clear, defensible metrics that researchers, leadership, and the public can rely on.

What it asks for · 5

  • Strong Python programming skills, including production or research infrastructure
  • Experience building or operating distributed systems, data pipelines, or other infrastructure that needs to be reliable at scale
  • Clear written and verbal communication, especially when explaining technical results to non-specialists
  • Comfort operating in an on-call or production-support capacity when training runs are live
  • Care about the societal impacts of your work and an interest in steering powerful AI to be safe and beneficial

Also a plus

  • Hands-on experience using large language models such as Claude, including prompting, sampling, and scaffolding
  • Background in data visualization and a track record of building dashboards people actually trust and use
  • Experience developing robust evaluation metrics for language models
  • Experience with observability, monitoring, or experiment-tracking systems
  • Background in statistics and experimental design
  • Experience with large-scale dataset sourcing, curation, and processing
  • Experience running or supporting ML training infrastructure
  • A bias toward picking up slack and operating flexibly across team boundaries

What the job covers

  • Design and run new evaluations of Claude's capabilities — reasoning, agentic behavior, knowledge, safety properties — and produce visualizations that make the results legible to researchers and decision-makers
  • Build and harden the distributed eval execution platform so hundreds of evals run reliably against checkpoints throughout production RL training runs
  • Own the dashboards researchers and leadership use to monitor model health during training, improving signal-to-noise, reducing latency, and making regressions impossible to miss
  • Debug anomalous eval results mid-training-run, determine whether the cause is a model change or an infrastructure issue, and communicate the answer clearly under time pressure
  • Improve the tooling, libraries, and workflows researchers use to implement and iterate on evaluations
  • Partner with research teams across the full lifecycle of a new capability — from defining what to measure to interpreting results as training progresses
  • Run experiments to characterize how prompting, sampling, and scaffolding choices affect results on internal and industry benchmarks
  • Communicate evaluations and their results to internal stakeholders and, where appropriate, external audiences

Tools and skills named

Models & research
  • Evaluations6×
  • Prompt engineering2×
  • LLM
  • Machine learning
Cloud & infra
  • Observability2×
  • Distributed systems
Data
  • Data pipelines
  • Statistics
Ways of working
  • On-call
  • Slack
Languages
  • Python

Words the posting leans on

  • results8×
  • eval7×
  • evaluations6×
  • experience6×
  • infrastructure6×
  • researchers6×
  • run6×
  • training6×
  • model5×
  • build4×
  • capability4×
  • claude4×
  • research4×
  • dashboards3×
  • data3×
  • design3×

Counted from the posting after the mission statement and the legal notices are set aside. The ones near the top are the ones a screener is looking for.

The posting, your resume, and the gaps between them. One click loads all three.

More open at Anthropic

every open role at Anthropic

How this page was made

An automated read of a public job posting, fetched August 25, 2026 and last changed by Anthropic on August 21, 2026. Every list above is pulled from the posting’s own sentences — nothing rewritten, nothing added, no judgment about the role or the company. Counts and seniority are read off the text by rule, so they can be wrong where the posting is unusual. The original is the only thing that binds. Openings close without warning; check the source before spending an evening on it.