Staff Applied Scientist - Agentic Interfaces

Datadog · New York, New York, USA · Dev Eng · listed May 29, 2026

The shape of it

Seniority
Staff
Experience asked
10+ years
Where
On site
Stated pay
$276,000 – $345,000 USD
Requirements listed
0
Length
1,246 words

In the posting’s own words

This role is about that last piece. We're hiring a Staff Applied Scientist to define what "good" means for an Agentic interface at Datadog and to build the measurement systems that make it true. "Good" isn't one number — it spans answer quality, tool-selection accuracy, retrieval relevance, latency, token cost, and end-to-end agent success on real customer workflows. You'll design the evals, build the datasets, define the metrics, and partner with the AI engineers on the team to land the platform that lets every product group at Datadog ship integrations that are demonstrably better release over release.

What the job covers

  • Own the evaluation strategy for Datadog's AI agent integrations. Define the metrics — offline and online, quality and cost, single-turn and trajectory-level — that the team and the broader organization optimize against.
  • Build the eval datasets, golden traces, and regression harnesses that catch quality changes before they hit customers, and make those assets reusable by every team contributing tools to the platform.
  • Drive measurable improvements to retrieval relevance, tool-selection accuracy, and context efficiency, partnering closely with the AI engineers on the team who build the underlying platform.
  • Run applied research on the open problems in agent–data interaction: tool selection under large catalogs, multi-turn agent evaluation, grounding and hallucination control on live telemetry, cost/quality tradeoffs at scale.
  • Partner with the Bits SRE, Bits Assistant, and Bits Dev Agent teams so first-party agents benefit from the same measurement substrate as third-party integrations, and so learnings move freely in both directions.
  • Provide technical leadership across the Agentic Interfaces team and the broader organization through design reviews, working groups, and mentorship, and represent the team externally through talks, blog posts, and contributions to the open agent ecosystem.
  • You have a BS/MS/PhD in a scientific field, or equivalent experience.
  • 10+ years of relevant engineering or applied science experience, including time as a technical lead.
  • Proven track record of leading ML or GenAI initiatives in a product-driven environment, from research through production.
  • Significant experience with evaluation, experimentation, or measurement of ML systems at scale.
  • You bring a strong product mindset and are comfortable driving initiatives across cross-functional teams.
  • You thrive in ambiguity and can make sound technical calls when the path isn’t yet defined.

Degree language

  • You have a BS/MS/PhD in a scientific field, or equivalent experience.

Tools and skills named

Cloud & infra
  • Datadog8×
  • Site reliability3×
  • Observability
Models & research
  • Machine learning4×
  • Evaluations
Ways of working
  • Cross-functional2×
  • Mentorship2×
Data
  • Experimentation2×
Security & compliance
  • Security

Words the posting leans on

  • agent21×
  • bits9×
  • build8×
  • evaluation7×
  • experience7×
  • tool7×
  • measurement6×
  • platform6×
  • technical6×
  • applied5×
  • integrations5×
  • open5×
  • quality5×
  • research5×
  • broader organization4×
  • data4×

Counted from the posting after the mission statement and the legal notices are set aside. The ones near the top are the ones a screener is looking for.

The posting, your resume, and the gaps between them. One click loads all three.

More open at Datadog

every open role at Datadog

How this page was made

An automated read of a public job posting, fetched August 25, 2026 and last changed by Datadog on August 24, 2026. Every list above is pulled from the posting’s own sentences — nothing rewritten, nothing added, no judgment about the role or the company. Counts and seniority are read off the text by rule, so they can be wrong where the posting is unusual. The original is the only thing that binds. Openings close without warning; check the source before spending an evening on it.